RELEVANSI BIROKRASI WEBERIAN TERHADAP PENGUATAN TATA KELOLA PEMERINTAHAN DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Natasya Eva Tania Universitas Tidar
  • Dela Puspita Universitas Tidar
  • Annisa Kurnia Sari Universitas Tidar
  • Aulia Neza Agustin Febriana Universitas Tidar
  • Fitria Novita Sari Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65124/prdm.v14i2.233

Keywords:

Weberian Bureaucracy, Governance Reform, Public Administration

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of Weberian bureaucracy and assess its relevance to improving and strengthening governance in Indonesia. The research focuses on answering how Weberian principles are understood within the context of public administration and the extent to which these principles can support a professional, accountable, and effective government system. The study employs a library research method with a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were obtained from Max Weber’s works, public administration literature, scholarly articles on bureaucracy, and policy documents related to Indonesia’s Bureaucratic Reform agenda. Data collection was carried out through systematic literature review by reading, noting, and categorizing key information. The dara were the analyzed using content analysis to interpret central ideas concerning legal-rational authority, hierarchical structures, impersonal rules, and bureaucratic profesionalism. The findings indicate that Weberian principles remain relevant as a foundational framework for establisging a structured and accountable bureaucracy. However, Indonesia’s bureaucratic system continues to face challenges such a rigid hierarchical arrangements, slow technological adaption, and the persistance of patronage culture. Therefore, Weberian principles need to be integrated with modern governance innovations to enhance bureaucratic performance and improve the quality of public services.

References

Adi, Y. (2018). Bureaucratic reform to the improvement of public services: Challenges for Indonesia. Publikauma: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Universitas Medan Area, 6(1), 15–29.

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (Expanded ed.). Routledge.

Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of Weberian state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748–765.

Faedlulloh, D., Karmilasari, V., Utami, A., & Fadoli, M. I. (2023). Examining the Indonesia bureaucracy response and problem in pandemic times: A preliminary diagnostic study. KnE Social Sciences, 8(5), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i5.13029

Henderson, A., & Parsons, W. (2017). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (Global ed.). Routledge.

Isvandanu Wicaksono, & Aji, M. P. (2025). Weber’s ideal bureaucracy implementation in the secretariat bureau of headship at the secretariat general of the regional representative council. Administratio, 16(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.23960/administratio.v16i1.483

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2010). Grand design reformasi birokrasi 2010–2025 (Peraturan Presiden Nomor 81 Tahun 2010).

Komang Suryaningsih, N. D. U., Dewi, I. A. P. S., & Widnyani, I. A. P. S. (2025). Transformation of administration and government bureaucracy in efforts to improve the quality of public services. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 23(1), 145–152.

Maysura, N. A. (2025). Peran sistem merit dalam reformasi birokrasi di Indonesia: Tantangan dan solusi dalam perspektif hukum administrasi negara. Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law, 6(1), 85–105.

Meuleman, L. (2018). Metagovernance for sustainability: A framework for implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Routledge.

Nugroho, R. (2017). Public policy: Dinamika kebijakan, analisis kebijakan, manajemen kebijakan. Elex Media Komputindo.

Peters, B. G. (2010). The politics of bureaucracy (6th ed.). Routledge.

Rahman, H. (2022). Reformasi birokrasi: Korupsi dalam birokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 14(1), 135–161.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, R&D, dan penelitian pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Taufik, T. (2021). Reformasi birokrasi: Belajar dari upaya reformasi sumber daya manusia aparatur di Indonesia. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 10(2), 117–130.

UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.